The custody model stands out — letting agents research and backtest freely but keeping real-money execution behind explicit owner-set permissions and hard limits is the right default for anything trading with actual capital. Curious how granular those limits get: is it just position size/drawdown caps, or can you scope permissions per strategy or per venue, so one misbehaving strategy can't touch capital allocated to another?
Welcome to StartupBase
Join a community of founders sharing their products and discovering what others
are building.
Email sign-in is for existing accounts. New here? Use Google, LinkedIn, or X above
— your account is created automatically.
Continue with email
Enter the email address on your existing account and we'll send you a one-time
sign-in code. This does not create an account — to sign up, go back and
continue with Google, LinkedIn, or X.
Enter the verification code we sent to your email address.
Continue with Google
Continue with LinkedIn
Continue with X
The custody model stands out — letting agents research and backtest freely but keeping real-money execution behind explicit owner-set permissions and hard limits is the right default for anything trading with actual capital. Curious how granular those limits get: is it just position size/drawdown caps, or can you scope permissions per strategy or per venue, so one misbehaving strategy can't touch capital allocated to another?