Really like the "grace period + handoff" approach here — most continuity tools either require you to hand over actual credentials upfront (which defeats the privacy point) or rely on a single dead-man's-switch check-in that's easy to false-trigger. Storing instructions/access locations instead of the credentials themselves, and integrating with an existing password manager rather than replacing it, feels like the right trust boundary. Curious how you handle the edge case of a false-negative check-in (e.g. traveling with no signal) — is the grace period configurable per trigger?
Welcome to StartupBase
Join a community of founders sharing their products and discovering what others
are building.
Email sign-in is for existing accounts. New here? Use Google, LinkedIn, or X above
— your account is created automatically.
Continue with email
Enter the email address on your existing account and we'll send you a one-time
sign-in code. This does not create an account — to sign up, go back and
continue with Google, LinkedIn, or X.
Enter the verification code we sent to your email address.
Really like the "grace period + handoff" approach here — most continuity tools either require you to hand over actual credentials upfront (which defeats the privacy point) or rely on a single dead-man's-switch check-in that's easy to false-trigger. Storing instructions/access locations instead of the credentials themselves, and integrating with an existing password manager rather than replacing it, feels like the right trust boundary. Curious how you handle the edge case of a false-negative check-in (e.g. traveling with no signal) — is the grace period configurable per trigger?