Nabeel Sharafat

Hey there 👋

I built ListPik after watching the same thing happen over and over: a genuinely nice apartment gets skipped because the photos were taken at 6pm on a phone, with yellow lamp light, crushed shadows, and a window blown out to white.

The existing options are both bad. Hire a photographer — expensive, and useless when you need the listing live tomorrow. Or run the photos through a generic AI editor and get back a room that's been quietly redecorated: new furniture, a sky that never existed over that house, a "virtual" wall where a real one stands. That's not enhancement, that's a complaint waiting to happen when the guest walks in.

ListPik is built around one constraint: a stronger photo has to describe the same property.

Lighting correction, accurate white balance, straightened geometry, noise/clarity — the things a photographer would actually fix Interior and exterior modes, so a facade and an overcast sky get a restrained pass, not a fantasy one Every result comes with a drag-the-divider before/after, because you should be approving the image, not trusting it It runs in the browser. Upload, pick the scene, inspect, download. Pricing is credits, not a subscription: $12 / 10, $30 / 30, $68 / 75. They don't expire. There are 3 free demo credits and a sample photo, so you can test the full workflow without hunting for a file.

What it won't do: pick a better camera angle, stage an empty room, or invent detail the sensor never captured. Our public methodology at listpik.com/methodology documents the correction scope and limits in plain language.

I'd love feedback on where the line should sit — sky replacement is the one everybody argues about. Too far, or fair game? I'm here all day.

nice product! it's good for the solo builders and it will be helpful