We built DeepVerify because we kept doing the same thing: pausing a video,
opening a new tab, typing in a claim that sounded off, and giving up halfway
through the search results.
Checking something takes more effort than hearing it does. That gap is part of
why bad information travels so easily.
So DeepVerify does the checking in place. It reads the captions or the page,
pulls out the claims that can actually be verified, and puts a verdict next to
each one with the sources attached.
One deliberate choice: it is allowed to say "Uncertain." Always returning
true or false would look more impressive, but a fact-checker that is
confidently wrong is worse than none at all. When the evidence isn't there,
it says so.
Two things we'd genuinely like feedback on:
Where does it get things wrong? Send us the video or article and we'll dig in.
Is a sidebar the right place for this, or does it get in the way?
Free to install. Works on YouTube, articles, and live audio.
Welcome to StartupBase
Join a community of founders sharing their products and discovering what others
are building.
Email sign-in is for existing accounts. New here? Use Google, LinkedIn, or X above
— your account is created automatically.
Continue with email
Enter the email address on your existing account and we'll send you a one-time
sign-in code. This does not create an account — to sign up, go back and
continue with Google, LinkedIn, or X.
Enter the verification code we sent to your email address.
Hi StartupBase 👋
We built DeepVerify because we kept doing the same thing: pausing a video, opening a new tab, typing in a claim that sounded off, and giving up halfway through the search results.
Checking something takes more effort than hearing it does. That gap is part of why bad information travels so easily.
So DeepVerify does the checking in place. It reads the captions or the page, pulls out the claims that can actually be verified, and puts a verdict next to each one with the sources attached.
One deliberate choice: it is allowed to say "Uncertain." Always returning true or false would look more impressive, but a fact-checker that is confidently wrong is worse than none at all. When the evidence isn't there, it says so.
Two things we'd genuinely like feedback on:
Free to install. Works on YouTube, articles, and live audio.