Aleh Barysevich

Aleh Barysevich

Founder at @seopowersuite and @AwarioApp. Digital Marketer & Speaker at SMX, BrightonSEO. Author at Search Engine Land, Search Engine Journal. Tweet about #SEO.

Comments

Nice tool - upvoted and shared! Good luck with your launch

Looks interesting, I will definitely give it a try. And good luck with your product :)

Nice timing on this one. The EAA deadline snuck up on a lot of teams, and honestly most accessibility tools just check generic WCAG without tying it back to EN 301 549. Like that you can just drop in a URL and scan - makes it way easier to at least see where you stand. Congrats on the launch!

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@maheshkumar_performspark Good question, Mahesh. Most teams treat the drafts as structured starting points rather than finished articles. The outline and intent coverage come from RankDots, then editors refine and add first-hand experience. On brand voice specifically: you can paste a few text samples from your existing content, and RankDots will match that voice in the drafts it generates. That gets you much closer to publishable, though I'd still recommend an editorial pass.

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@hamzacreed98 Thanks, Hamza, that's the goal. Curious which part saves you the most time once you've used it a bit; for most SEOs it's the clustering, but I've heard different answers.

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@chatixapp01 Thanks! Give it a spin and let me know how it goes. Always curious to hear how it performs on different niches.

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@replygen Thanks! "Avoiding wasted effort" is exactly the problem we started from. The most expensive mistake in SEO isn't bad writing — it's spending weeks on topics that were never going to move the needle.

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@digitalcodelabs Fair enough, Daniel and honestly that's a common way to use it. Plenty of users treat the drafts as optional and stop at the keyword research and cluster planning stage. The research side works fine on its own; the drafting is there for those who want it, not a required step.

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@theshopninjas2026 Yep, you nailed the reasoning behind it. Most teams run keyword research in one tool, plan clusters in a spreadsheet, and draft somewhere else — and things get lost at every handoff. And agreed on clustering being the underrated part. Individual keywords tell you what people search; clusters tell you what you need to cover to actually rank.

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@wavechat Appreciate that, Vitor. We spent a lot of time on the docs precisely because the workflow is a bit different from classic keyword tools — glad it clicked quickly. If anything felt unclear, I'd genuinely like to hear it

@ab80 · 1 week ago · RankDots

@raseedapp805 Thanks, Johnathan! Yep, topic clusters are the core of it. The bet is that planning at the cluster level beats chasing individual keywords, especially now that search rewards depth on a topic over one-off pages.