The focus on context is spot on — surfacing what changed and why is exactly what most code review tools miss. Guiding reviewer attention to the parts that matter most makes big PRs far less intimidating, and framing review as collaborative dialogue instead of adversarial nitpicking is the right culture to bake into a tool.
What didn't work well?
Nothing broken in my first look — the flow feels solid. I'd just like more detail on how it handles very large PRs in monorepo setups.
What could be better?
A live sandbox with a demo PR so teams can try the review experience before connecting a repo, and clearer info on GitLab/Bitbucket support alongside GitHub.
Email sign-in is for existing accounts. New here? Use Google, LinkedIn, or X above
— your account is created automatically.
Continue with email
Enter the email address on your existing account and we'll send you a one-time
sign-in code. This does not create an account — to sign up, go back and
continue with Google, LinkedIn, or X.
Enter the verification code we sent to your email address.
Continue with Google
Continue with LinkedIn
Continue with X
The focus on context is spot on — surfacing what changed and why is exactly what most code review tools miss. Guiding reviewer attention to the parts that matter most makes big PRs far less intimidating, and framing review as collaborative dialogue instead of adversarial nitpicking is the right culture to bake into a tool.
Nothing broken in my first look — the flow feels solid. I'd just like more detail on how it handles very large PRs in monorepo setups.
A live sandbox with a demo PR so teams can try the review experience before connecting a repo, and clearer info on GitLab/Bitbucket support alongside GitHub.